Safi sits in front of your LLM calls and cuts what you pay — automatically, on every request that's safe to touch, with extra care for Arabic. Swap one API endpoint. Your models, prompts, and answers don't change.
Today: every request, full price, straight through.
With Safi: routine requests cost less, automatically. Anything that shouldn't be touched goes through exactly as before.
Nobody overspends on purpose — most traffic just never gets sorted or double-checked before it's sent, and it all pays top price by default. Safi profiles your traffic, decides — request by request — what can be made cheaper without changing the answer, and applies exactly that. Nothing more.
Routine traffic costs less. Anything that needs the best you have still gets it, no exceptions.
If an answer depends on who's asking, it goes through in full, every time — no near-enough answers on anything that's actually yours.
Arabic-heavy traffic gets handled with that tax in mind, on top of everything else we do.
Every change ships behind a quality gate. If it would change the answer, we don't apply it. How we make that call is not something we publish — what matters to you is that it's checked before it ships, and reversible if you disagree with it.
Before an optimization touches real traffic, we run it against two alternatives on a controlled internal benchmark: doing nothing, and a "blind" optimizer that applies the same trick to every request regardless of risk — which is what most generic gateways do.
The blind optimizer lost on both counts: it saved less, and a quarter of its answers came back wrong and had to be redone at full price. Knowing where not to cut is what makes the rest safe to cut.
| Path | Cost vs. baseline | Wrong answers |
|---|---|---|
| Do nothing | baseline | 0 of 40 |
| Blind optimizer | −55% | 10 of 40 |
| Safi | −81% | 0 of 40 |
If you have a product that calls an LLM API and the bill is real and growing, this is for you — English product, Arabic product, or both.
Everything above works in any language. Arabic gets extra treatment on top, because it's priced worse to begin with — and the exact multiple shifts depending on the model, so we track it rather than assume it.
That's our job. You send a sample of traffic, we come back with a number and the risk attached to it. If you like the number, we run it.
A slice of your traffic. Read-only, no integration, nothing switched on.
We profile the workload and build a plan sized to it — including the cuts we refuse to make on your behalf. You get the number and the risk, not a homework assignment.
One endpoint change and it's live for your traffic. Quality is checked continuously; anything that fails the gate is reversed.
You keep paying your provider directly. We invoice a share of the savings we can prove — agreed with you before anything goes live, and sized to your volume and workload.
See your number first| Setup & integration | $0 |
| Monthly platform fee | $0 |
| Seats & minimums | None |
| Our fee | A share of proven savings |
| A month with no savings | No invoice |
Every invoice arrives with the usage it was calculated from, so you can re-derive the number yourself.
Savings attached to a response that fails your quality gate are struck off the bill. We don't get paid for a worse answer.
No term, no notice period, no exit fee. The audit alone is worth having.
The benchmark table above is not — it's a synthetic, seeded test corpus we built to prove the mechanism, not a savings promise for any specific customer. The market figures (30–60% overspend, the Arabic tax) come from our own research across MENA AI products. Your own number is measured on your own traffic, for free, before anything changes.
No — nothing you haven't approved. You see the projected saving and the risk on each change before it goes live, and can reverse any of it.
They don't have to. Analysis can run where your data already lives, with sensitive fields removed before anything is read.
The major international providers, the big clouds, self-hosted models — and we're building specific support for the Arabic-native models most tools ignore.
Send a traffic sample, get your number, the risk behind it, and a straight answer on whether we're worth it. Private beta — a few design partners at a time.